Developed on the basis of the IS tank. The currently is a lot of fun and the only really decent tank in the line – fast, armored, brutal dpm and okay alpha. So guys please share ur opinion and experience about these tanks. However, these rounds were expensive, in short supply, and only moderately more effective than the standard non-penetrating high-explosive round. FluffyRedFox 15 Posted 14 July – The initial variant, developed in Scabolcz, on 30 December –
|License:||For Personal Use Only|
|iPhone 5, 5S resolutions||640×1136|
|iPhone 6, 6S resolutions||750×1334|
|iPhone 7, 7 Plus, 8, 8 Plus resolutions||1080×1920|
|Android Mobiles HD resolutions||360×640, 540×960, 720×1280|
|Android Mobiles Full HD resolutions||1080×1920|
|Mobiles HD resolutions||480×800, 768×1280|
|Mobiles QHD, iPhone X resolutions||1440×2560|
|HD resolutions||1280×720, 1366×768, 1600×900, 1920×1080, 2560×1440, Original|
The factory trials began the same month, followed by state trials on the Gorohovetskom test range. Feels very underwhelming to isy without its top gun. Maybe I’m just sad a tier 8 has far higher pen and same alpha as an E with marginally worse accuracy. MattieW, on 14 July – Sign In Username or email: I dislike ISU Nerf.
There’s a difference between “overpowered” and “broken”.
ISU — Tier VIII Soviet tank destroyer | Blitz Hangar
Gun mantlet aside, the armor is overall very weak. The suspension consisted of twelve torsion bars for the six road ish on either side.
Tier Xs in order of unlocking: Akadeadlytank 02 Apr You make it sound like it was accurate before. With the recent nerf to view-range, Binocs are much less effective now. The ISU was used for infantry and tank support, attacks on fortified positions in a direct-fire role, support on the battlefield in an indirect-fire role, and for fighting against tanks with direct fire.
I need help which tank to play,Su-101 or Isu 152?
Later was added a fourth round hatch, at the superstructure roof on the right, next to the rectangular hatch on the left. The m1 is decent, the is decent but worse, the mm gun on it is horribly inaccurate in reality it’s less accurate than the same gun on any of the heaviesthe su is the biggest junk siu ever played, and the Obj is good-ish but not great.
What is the reason for that. Uebergewicht 16 Posted 31 December – It is to give your opponent no choice but to lose. In the area of the gun, where the mantlet combined with the hull-front behind it and the housing of the recoil mechanism, the armor thickness was mm.
Carry a noob and he will have victory for a battle teach a man to carry and he will lead to domination. Should 15 Be nerfed?
ISU-152 – The struggle is real.
This was the moment of appearance of the first fighting vehicle of this family. Their tank and mechanized units were well equipped with towed artillery, but the towed guns were very vulnerable while moving and could not support tanks and motorized infantry during rapid advances into enemy positions, especially when they lacked the armored fully-enclosed design of fighting vehicles like the ISU Inaccurate guns are in reality more accurate in the curent built, it’s just the way they are.
Community Forum Software by IP. Still a threat regardless of tier, very high fear factor with the top gun. The key is to get to the endgame and then play it very aggressively I think. DVK9 8 Posted Nov 26 – 12 Sign In Username or email: It used elements of the IS-2 and IS-3 tanks. You’re going to get CoD’d pretty easily as the traverse is horrible.
Despite the ISU’s good features, it suffered in some other areas. One prototype, developed in This is not to say, however, that the D-4S is inaccurate.